ππππππππ’ πππ πππππππππ πΈπππππππππ ππππ΄πππππππππ ππ ππ ππ‘πππππππππ π ππππ:
For India to flourish, it needs to innovate, compete and give full space for entrepreneurship. This alone will help in wealth generation in an integrated world. This would require reforms in all sectors. This would involve change in all sectors. These reforms are bound to have resistance from those who perceive losing out in the short term. Reform measures invariably has to get across the resistance - active or passive - of a few with entrenched interests. A connect between reforms and progress needs to be perceived by the majority to give impetus to it in a democratic polity.
The (neutral) citizens may not be supportive of the reform measures when they do not see a direct connection between their lot and the reforms. However, it is not an option to give them free doles to keep them engaged as in a Universal Basic Income. There needs to be a system which addresses this challenge of engaging all of the population in the right way along with ensuring security to them. This would also mean that they are stakeholders in free enterprise, competition and innovation promoting reforms.
Technology and finance are changing at an exponential pace. The productivity of the society has been improving alongside. It is said that the improvement in productivity has been exponential after 1850. The productivity increasing exponentially is seen to lead to exploitation of natural resources at a scale which is surely not sustainable. If every Indian and Chinese start using the amount of energy that is presently being used in US, the climate challenge would explode.
The improvement in productivity has not been uniformly spread - resulting in rising inequality. The productivity at present, is in itself sufficient and more to serve sustainable quantum of products and services to the whole population without requiring all of the population to be in the economic production cycle β leading to depravation due to lack of purchasing power even when resources are available. The productivity can be even higher if sectoral and structural reforms are made. However, this would alter the present scheme of security for various sections of population.
This position makes any reform effort difficult to execute as various stakeholders are status quoist because of thier vested interest. The note tries to argue for a modified system which will provide for social security, dignity, productivity and equity even as the nation moves to strength by undertaking factor market reforms and other structural reforms in various sectors. These reforms are needed for India to be an assured power in the coming age where all of its population are stakeholders.
To confidently go ahead on the high productivity path, India needs a safety net for those who are unable to keep pace. This safety net is presently sought to be provided, in the rural areas, as 100 days of wage employment to those who are willing to do unskilled labour in the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS). However, the natural selection of the needy with the condition of doing unskilled labour has the following issues.
1. Loss of Skill -Those exercising the safety net are forced to do unskilled labour even if they are skilled. This leads to their skills not being honoured, conserved, promoted or newly developed. The mandate of doing unskilled labour hampers the productivity of the population which had been left behind in the productivity race β condemning them to more of inequality
2. Unproductive expenditure- For the same expenditure in the rural employment guarantee scheme, much more rural assets could have been created. The work estimates are on the higher side because of the labour component being mandatory. These assets could have been achieved much cheaper with machines.
3. Possibility of graft- Work estimates are inflated as being done using unskilled labour. The asset gets made at a lower cost using machines and the booking gets done in the name of labour. This results in the benefits of the scheme being targeted to undeserving, especially in villages where social schism is more pronounced.
4. Dignity issues: For selection of the needy, the condition placed is of doing manual unskilled labour. Selection could have been made in a more dignified manner by providing for skilled labour, if possible at least, with a wage which is at a lower level. The Minimum Wage acts as a detriment to full employment. Here the safety net would provide for a de facto Minimum Wage at which full employment is guaranteed with the resources of the State. Without this employment guarantee, the enforcement of Minimum wage leads to unemployment!
5. Sustainability of assets made in MGNREGS: Presently assets in the scheme are made with the premise that the scheme is to provide for unskilled labour. In many cases, the required material component is not provided for. This results in the lowered sustainability of assets that are created in the scheme.
6. Lack of convergence: Engagement to people is provided for by the State under other State schemes as well. However, there is no unified tracking mechanism for the engagement that is provided by the State. In extreme cases, it is found that some individuals are given more than possible employment when all schemes are put together.
7. There are disabled individuals who might not find engagement easily even when they are skilled. Stand-alone works are not possible in MGNREGS. The present guidelines provide for support roles for the disabled. However, this is not possible on occasions where there are not many people who are able bodied asking for work.
Proposal
The proposal is for a scheme which has the following attributes
1. Guaranteeing at least 40 hours of wage engagement every week for every adult.
2. Unskilled wages will be offered. Wage level will be sufficient for sustenance but below the Minimum Wages rate (as provided in present MGNREGS)
3. The time offered by the citizen can be used for skilled labour, unskilled labour or a skill training program. In exceptional cases, it could even be used to promote social causes or for counselling.
4. The objective of the program will be to skill the person to a level where she or he can migrate to the skilled wage rate available in the economy without being dependent on the scheme.
5. Rather than define this as an entitlement, such a dispensation may be made conditional to the citizen being collaborative to development oriented reforms.
Challenges
1. The present MGNREG Act provides for unskilled labour: Though the body of the Act provides for wage employment to those willing to do unskilled labour and does not explicitly provide that skilled labour is not to be given, the schedule of the act has a clear mention that unskilled labour is to be provided. This would require amendment.
2. The present act mandates that assets are to be created: The primary intention here seems to be ensure that there is more productivity as a result of the expenditure incurred in the Act. It could also be to ensure that the work is actually done rather than just booking unproductive expenditure. This could be replaced by a mandate to do building of productive assets as much as possible. We now have technology which can monitor skilling programs and skilled/unskilled work even when they are not leading to concrete assets. This improvement in technology could be leveraged.
3. The resources required for the scheme would be very high: A back of the envelope calculation to provide for 20 days of 100 Rs wage to 1 billion people leads to the figure of Rs. 24 lakh crores for 12 months. But if the unemployment rate is taken to be 10 percent it would be around Rs. 2.4 lakh crores. This would be provided converging the engaging platform with other schemes where people are engaged. Providing for the material component required, the required provision would come up to Rs. 4 lakh crores.
Way forward
It is suggested that the MGNREG Act is suitably amended to provide for the scheme as:-
1. It already has a provision which overrides Minimum Wages Act, which would be required to act as a natural selection for the beneficiary.
2. There is a machinery already in place for execution right up to village level
3. The present form of NREG is having the difficulties as brought out above.
A suitable group may be asked to look into the formulation of a suitable scheme after consultation with all Stakeholders. The aim of the scheme should be to provide for a stake to all citizens in the reform measures in the interest of enterprise, innovation and competition.